<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>All Nice Stuff &#187; Afghanistan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.allnicestuff.com/tag/afghanistan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.allnicestuff.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 06:06:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A Child&#8217;s Guide to US Foreign Policy</title>
		<link>http://www.allnicestuff.com/2008/05/12/a-childs-guide-to-us-foreign-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.allnicestuff.com/2008/05/12/a-childs-guide-to-us-foreign-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 09:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Prince</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allnicestuff.com/?p=80</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An american family were sitting at home when a child asked some questions to his father. Note: A little lengthy but nevertheless a good read. I enjoyed it. Hope you do to Q: Daddy, why did we have to attack Iraq? A: Because they had weapons of mass destruction honey. Q: But the inspectors didn’t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An <strong>american family</strong> were sitting at home when a child asked some questions to his father.<br />
Note: A little lengthy but nevertheless a good read. I enjoyed it. Hope you do to</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> Daddy, why did we have to attack <strong>Iraq</strong>?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> Because they had weapons of mass destruction honey.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> But the inspectors didn’t find any weapons of mass destruction.<br />
<strong>A:</strong> That’s because the Iraqis were hiding them.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> And that’s why we invaded <strong>Iraq</strong>?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> Yep. Invasions always work better than inspections.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> But after we invaded them, we STILL didn’t find any weapons of mass destruction, did we?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> That’s because the weapons are so well hidden. Don’t worry, we’ll find something, probably right before the 2008 election.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> Why did <strong>Iraq</strong> want all those weapons of mass destruction?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> To use them in a war, silly.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> I’m confused. If they had all those weapons that they planned to use in a war, then why didn’t they use any of those weapons when we went to war with them?<br />
<strong><span id="more-80"></span>A:</strong> Well, obviously they didn’t want anyone to know they had those weapons, so they chose to die by the thousands rather than defend themselves.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> That doesn’t make sense Daddy. Why would they choose to die if they had all those big weapons to fight us back with?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> It’s a different culture. It’s not supposed to make sense.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> I don’t know about you, but I don’t think they had any of those weapons our government said they did.<br />
<strong>A:</strong> Well, you know, it doesn’t matter whether or not they had those weapons. We had another good reason to invade them anyway.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> And what was that?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> Even if Iraq didn’t have weapons of mass destruction, <strong>Saddam Hussein</strong> was a cruel dictator, which is another good reason to invade another country.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> Why? What does a cruel <strong>dictator</strong> do that makes it OK to invade his country?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> Well, for one thing, he tortured his own people.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> Kind of like what they do in <strong>China</strong>?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> Don’t go comparing China to Iraq. China is a good economic competitor, where millions of people work for slave wages in sweatshops to make <strong>U.S.</strong> corporations richer.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> So if a country lets its people be exploited for <strong>American</strong> corporate gain, it’s a good country, even if that country tortures people?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> Right.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> Why were people in Iraq being tortured?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> For political crimes, mostly, like criticizing the government. People who criticized the government in <strong>Iraq</strong> were sent to prison and tortured.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> Isn’t that exactly what happens in <strong>China</strong>?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> I told you, <strong>China</strong> is different.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> What’s the difference between <strong>China</strong> and <strong>Iraq</strong>?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> Well, for one thing, <strong>Iraq</strong> was ruled by the Ba’ath party, while <strong>China</strong> is Communist.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> Didn’t you once tell me <strong>Communists</strong> were bad?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> No, just Cuban Communists are bad.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> How are the <strong>Cuban Communists</strong> bad?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> Well, for one thing, people who criticize the government in Cuba are sent to prison and tortured.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> Like in <strong>Iraq</strong>?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> Exactly.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> And like in <strong>China</strong>, too?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> I told you, <strong>China</strong>’s a good economic competitor. <strong>Cuba</strong>, on the other hand, is not.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> How come <strong>Cuba</strong> isn’t a good economic competitor?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> Well, you see, back in the early 1960s, our government passed some laws that made it illegal for Americans to trade or do any business with <strong>Cuba</strong> until they stopped being communists and started being capitalists like us.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> But if we got rid of those laws, opened up trade with <strong>Cuba</strong>, and started doing business with them, wouldn’t that help the <strong>Cubans</strong> become capitalists?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> Don’t be a smart-***.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> I didn’t think I was being one.<br />
<strong>A:</strong> Well, anyway, they also don’t have freedom of religion in <strong>Cuba</strong>.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> Kind of like <strong>China</strong> and the<strong> Falun Gong</strong> movement?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> I told you, stop saying bad things about <strong>China</strong>. Anyway,<strong> Saddam Hussein</strong> came to power through a military coup, so he’s not really a legitimate leader anyway.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> What’s a military coup?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> That’s when a military general takes over the government of a country by force, instead of holding free elections like we do in the<strong> United States</strong>.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> Didn’t the ruler of Pakistan come to power by a military coup?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> You mean <strong>General Pervez Musharraf</strong>? Uh, yeah, he did, but <strong>Pakistan</strong> is our friend.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> Why is <strong>Pakistan</strong> our friend if their leader is illegitimate?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> I never said <strong>Pervez Musharraf</strong> was illegitimate.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> Didn’t you just say a military general who comes to power by forcibly overthrowing the legitimate government of a nation is an illegitimate leader?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> Only <strong>Saddam Hussein</strong>.<strong> Pervez Musharraf</strong> is our friend, because he helped us invade <strong>Afghanistan</strong>.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> Why did we invade <strong>Afghanistan</strong>?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> Because of what they did to us on <strong>September 11th</strong>.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> What did <strong>Afghanistan</strong> do to us on <strong>September 11th</strong>?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> Well, on <strong>September 11th</strong>, nineteen men, fifteen of them Saudi Arabians, hijacked four airplanes and flew three of them into buildings, killing over 3,000 Americans.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> So how did <strong>Afghanistan</strong> figure into all that?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> Afghanistan was where those bad men trained, under the oppressive rule of the Taliban.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> Aren’t the <strong>Taliban</strong> those bad radical Islamics who chopped off people’s heads and hands?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> Yes, that’s exactly who they were. Not only did they chop off people’s heads and hands, but they oppressed women, too.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> Didn’t the <strong>Bush</strong> administration give the <strong>Taliban</strong> 43 million dollars back in May of 2001?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> Yes, but that money was a reward because they did such a good job fighting drugs.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> Fighting drugs?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> Yes, the Taliban were very helpful in stopping people from growing opium poppies.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> How did they do such a good job?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> Simple. If people were caught growing opium poppies, the Taliban would have their hands and heads cut off.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> So, when the <strong>Taliban</strong> cut off people’s heads and hands for growing flowers, that was OK, but not if they cut people’s heads and hands off for other reasons?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> Yes. It’s OK with us if radical Islamic fundamentalists cut off people’s hands for growing flowers, but it’s cruel if they cut off people’s hands for stealing bread.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> Don’t they also cut off people’s hands and heads in <strong>Saudi Arabia</strong>?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> That’s different. <strong>Afghanistan</strong> was ruled by a tyrannical patriarchy that oppressed women and forced them to wear burqas whenever they were in public, with death by stoning as the penalty for women who did not comply.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> Don’t Saudi women have to wear burqas in public, too?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> No, <strong>Saudi women</strong> merely wear a traditional Islamic body covering.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> What’s the difference?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> The traditional Islamic covering worn by Saudi women is a modest yet fashionable garment that covers all of a woman’s body except for her eyes and fingers. The burqa, on the other hand, is an evil tool of patriarchal oppression that covers all of a woman’s body except for her eyes and fingers.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> It sounds like the same thing with a different name.<br />
<strong>A:</strong> Now, don’t go comparing <strong>Afghanistan</strong> and<strong> Saudi Arabia</strong>. The Saudis are our friends.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> But I thought you said 15 of the 19 hijackers on <strong>September 11th</strong> were from <strong>Saudi Arabia</strong>.<br />
<strong>A:</strong> Yes, but they trained in <strong>Afghanistan</strong>.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> Who trained them?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> A very bad man named<strong> Osama bin Laden</strong>.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> Was he from <strong>Afghanistan</strong>?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> Uh, no, he was from<strong> Saudi Arabia</strong> too. But he was a bad man, a very bad man.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> I seem to recall he was our friend once.<br />
<strong>A:</strong> Only when we helped him and the <strong>mujahadeen</strong> repel the <strong>Soviet</strong> invasion of <strong>Afghanistan</strong> back in the 1980s.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> Who are the <strong>Soviets</strong>? Was that the Evil Communist Empire Ronald Reagan talked about?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> There are no more Soviets. The Soviet Union broke up in 1990 or thereabouts, and now they have elections and capitalism like us. We call them <strong>Russians</strong> now.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> So the Soviets ? I mean, the <strong>Russians</strong> ? are now our friends?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> Well, not really. You see, they were our friends for many years after they stopped being Soviets, but then they decided not to support our invasion of <strong>Iraq</strong>, so we’re mad at them now. We’re also mad at the <strong>French</strong> and the <strong>Germans</strong> because they didn’t help us invade Iraq either.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> So the <strong>French</strong> and <strong>Germans</strong> are evil, too?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> Not exactly evil, but just bad enough that we had to rename <strong>French</strong> fries and <strong>French</strong> toast to Freedom Fries and Freedom Toast.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> Do we always rename foods whenever another country doesn’t do what we want them to do?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> No, we just do that to our friends. Our enemies, we invade.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> But wasn’t <strong>Iraq</strong> one of our friends back in the 1980s?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> Well, yeah. For a while.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> Was <strong>Saddam Hussein</strong> ruler of <strong>Iraq</strong> back then?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> Yes, but at the time he was fighting against Iran, which made him our friend, temporarily.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> Why did that make him our friend?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> Because at that time, Iran was our enemy.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> Isn’t that when he gassed the <strong>Kurds</strong>?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> Yeah, but since he was fighting against Iran at the time, we looked the other way, to show him we were his friend.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> So anyone who fights against one of our enemies automatically becomes our friend?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> Most of the time, yes.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> And anyone who fights against one of our friends is automatically an enemy?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> Sometimes that’s true, too. However, if <strong>American</strong> corporations can profit by selling weapons to both sides at the same time, all the better.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> Why?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> Because war is good for the economy, which means war is good for <strong>America</strong>. Also, since God is on America’s side, anyone who opposes war is a godless <strong>un-American Communist</strong>. Do you understand now why we attacked <strong>Iraq</strong>?</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> I think so. We attacked them because God wanted us to, right?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> Yes.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> But how did we know God wanted us to attack <strong>Iraq</strong>?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> Well, you see, God personally speaks to<strong> George W. Bush</strong> and tells him what to do.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> So basically, what you’re saying is that we attacked <strong>Iraq</strong> because <strong>George W. Bush</strong> hears voices in his head?<br />
<strong>A:</strong> Yes! You finally understand how the world works. Now close your eyes, make yourself comfortable, and go to sleep. Good Night.</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 7px;">Reference:<br />
Daddy, why did we have to attack Iraq?</p>
<p>http://develnet.org/ThisAndThat/DaddyWhyDidWeHaveToAttackIraq</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.allnicestuff.com/2008/05/12/a-childs-guide-to-us-foreign-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

